reject your reset to slavery

April 9, 2021 By godfrey

COVID-19 is being used to usher in a new world of authoritarianism. A world dominated by constant digital surveillance, forced vaccinations, and tighter, top-down government control. A growing body of evidence – including practice exercises, financial incentives for associated individuals and corporations, and official public statements – suggests that the global pandemic of 2020 is in fact a smokescreen for a permanent, radical restructuring of our lives and society according to the model of the “Great Reset”. A worldwide coup is in progress.

We have all heard the expression, “Never let a good crisis go to waste”, well that applies even when the crisis was engineered. While the world was sheltering in place, making masks, and sanitizing every surface in their houses, The World Economic Forum, a group comprised of powerful elites, held a virtual summit to reveal their plan for an extreme restructuring of our society, our economy, and our very way of life, dubbed the “The Great Reset”.

Klaus Schwab, the director of the World Economic Forum, observes that “the pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world”. By employing the problem/reaction/solution tactics of the Hegelian dialectic, Schwab and his billionaire cronies are hoping to reinvent our world while the public is caught up in a fearful panic over a virus with a 99.8% survival rate.

Created Problem = COVID-19

Designed Reaction = Economic Collapse, a fearful public, and civil unrest

Predetermined Solution = Great Reset & Global Governance

We hereby Reject The Reset on the grounds that:

The WEF’s plan for global governance was made without the advice and consent of the people whose lives are to be affected by it, and it is being imposed upon the peoples of the world under deceptive and coercive conditions.

The Great Reset is a model for corporate governance that replaces representative government with “Stakeholder Capitalism.” Stakeholder Capitalism is essentially a strategy of risk management through predictive profiling and social engineering. Using an infrastructure of environmental and biometric surveillance (AI, Smart Cities, the Internet of Things, biometric nanotechnology, etc.), the Great Reset initiative will direct human choices in the direction of established corporate goals.

The surveillance infrastructure of the Great Reset requires every human being to accept technological and biological modifications to one’s person, including experimental vaccines. Individuals who refuse to abdicate bodily and cognitive sovereignty will be denied the ability to meet fundamental human needs (social, physical, legal, etc.).

The Great Reset’s bio-surveillance mechanism includes a mandatory vaccination, the safety and effectiveness of which are yet unproven. Should these vaccinations generate adverse side effects, manufacturers have been made exempt from liability lawsuits, leaving individuals and communities on their own to compensate for injuries. For most people, COVID is not a life-threatening condition and therefore the intrusive and potentially harmful vaccine therapy is unwarranted.

The government and corporate actors who are facilitating the roll-out of the Great Reset have demonstrated gross disregard for basic human rights and freedoms including freedom of speech and freedom of religion. The right to privacy has been ignored. Governments have used police force against persons who have questioned the swift, severe, and radical transformation of our society.

The Great Reset has incorporated the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals as ethical, social, and political standards. These goals are stated in ambiguous terms that are easy to manipulate. Moreover, they leave little room for diverse cultures, sovereign states, or individuals to offer thoughtful criticism of ethical requirements that contravene particular traditions and principles of social and personal order. The Great Reset’s value system threatens to reduce the complexity of world’s peoples to a homogeneous unity.

The Great Reset claims to protect the common good through an economy of sharing, the inclusion of social value measures in corporate accounting, the transition to digital currencies and personal identifications, blockchain distributed ledger technology, and open data plans. In practice, the Great Reset initiative will place all resources – including “human capital” resources – under the control of powerful elites who have benefitted financially and in consolidation of power from the economic and social system that is now being demolished. Under the “new social contract,” governments, non-profit organizations, corporations, and high-wealth individuals will control the commons and all the activities that occur therein.

The architects and sponsors of the Great Reset have well-documented connections to eugenics movements and have openly and seriously called for depopulation measures. Reason and common sense caution against trusting the care of common humanity to groups and individuals with eugenicist leanings.

The Great Reset urges the incorporation of technology into every aspect of human life and aspires to negate or to overcome the most basic structures of human experience including: limitations of time and space, the distinction between what is real and what is artificial, mortality, and more. These innovations damage fundamental social relationships between human beings by introducing technology into every human interaction. Furthermore, the “augmentation” of human life has transhumanist goals that will make it nearly impossible for “un-augmented” persons to participate in the world of the future.

The Great Reset initiative lays out strategies for urban planning, agricultural reforms, geo-engineering, and data-capture that pose dangerous risks to human and ecological health. Smart Cities employ technologies that depend on resource extraction that will exact a disproportionate toll on the world’s poor and vulnerable populations.

In short, The Great Reset is a means to an end.

And that end is a complete makeover of society under a technocratic regime of un-elected bureaucrats who want to dictate how the world is run from the top down, leveraging invasive technologies to track and trace your every move while censoring and silencing anyone who dares not comply.




Statement co-authored by Julianne Romanello, Ph.D. and Kilgore Rand (founder of I Do Not Comply)